![]() |
||
| Acoustics
Simulation of the Flow-Induced Noise in the Wake of a Surface-Mounted
Half-Cylinder: |
||
| |
![]() RANS solution showing 0.1%k(max) isosurfaces. |
|
| The CAA++ suite contains analytic methods to extract noise directly from an initial set of RANS data. The figure on the right illustrates predictions from the waveprop1 tool at two points in the near wake (point 1 on the cylinder rear face and point 2 downstream on the ground plane). Even with simple wave solutions, agreement with data is often good enough to provide useful information on trends. |
![]() Sound-pressure levels computed directly from the RANS data using the waveprop1 tool. |
|
| Analysis of the waveprop1 sound-source terms can be used to rapidly indicate regions of significant sound generation. The figure on the right illustrates these regions in the wake and on a cut-plane raised slightly above the ground. | ![]() Visualization of noise source strength in symmetry plane and a near-ground plane. |
|
| More
accurate solutions can be obtained using the Non-Linear Acoustics
Solver (NLAS), which is based on the solution of perturbation equations.
This simulation can be carried out on a separate acoustics mesh
and
does not involve the cost of additional transport equations (as with
LES or hybrid RANS/LES). Results on the right compare SPL predictions with a traditional hybrid RANS/LES method against the NLAS acoustics solver. These spectra, and the vorticity isosurface plots below, show the improved high-frequency detail obtained with the non-linear acoustics solver, even on relatively coarse meshes. (Note that both methods used the same mesh and time-step.) ![]() NLAS
simulation.
![]()
Hybrid RANS/LES.
|
![]() Sound
pressure levels computed using NLAS.
Sound pressure
levels computed using traditional hybrid RANS/LES. (Note the
early tail-off in power at higher frequencies because of
the coarse mesh resolution.)
|
|
| |
||